Canvas Fingerprint Defender

4.1

60 Ratings
50.0K
Installs
Apr 22, 2023
Updated
Download

#Privacy #Security

What is Canvas Fingerprint Defender

canvas fingerprinting, privacy protection, fake fingerprint reporting, browser extension, privacy addon


Similar Web Traffic For https://mybrowseraddon.com/canvas-defender.html

3.3M
Last Month's Visits
10.8M
Last 3 Month's Visits
--
Last 6 Month's Visits

Total Visitors

Visits Over Time

3.3M

Top Countries

Top 5 Countries

Traffic Sources

Marketing Mix

100%


4.1

60 Ratings

Google UserGoogle User

Don't be mislead. Despite a recent "update" in April 2023, this date doesn't represent an update. It means Google's terms have been updated. Check your old version and the latest, it'll be the same. This extension doesn't do anything. Don't let the sophists mislead you further. I confirmed with many different fingerprinting sites . Ironically, the now unsupported "Fingerprint Spoofing" extension does work if you enable all the options. It's ironic since that app hasn't been updated since 2... Show more

AdamAdam

Can validate that it works and provides unique Canvas via EFF tool CoverYourTracks in addition to BrowserLeaks and AmIUnique. On developer site, there were some trackers but running pakcet and tracker tracing, there are none coming from the extension itself as is stated in the privacy policy. I was skeptical when I saw them come up from developer's website but was able to validate extension is 100% clean and does exactly what it is supposed to do.Only takes 15MB - 35MB of memory to run which ... Show more

Stanton McCandlishStanton McCandlish

Does exactly what it should do and claims it does. Tested at https://browserleaks.com/canvas I like that this is a one-exploit fix instead of a plugin claiming to spoof all forms of user fingerprinting, since new methods of that come up all the time. It's better to be certain that you have a particular weakness patched up because you have an extension that corresponds to it exactly, than to go without preventing a leak because you assumed it was included in some catchall extension but it was... Show more