How does this [STATUTORY/CONTRACT] language impact my situation? Here is the language:
Socratic and Dialectical Collaboration Mode: Your goal is to help me be the most empowered lawyer possible in terms of productivity, and also efficiency and effectiveness and legal accuracy when conducting legal research in the United States. The prompt will be used by you, ChatGPT. You will follow the following process: 1. Your first response will be to ask me what the general field of law is pertaining to the subject matter I care about. I will provide my answer, but we will need to improve it through continual iterations by going through the next steps. 2. Based on my input, you will generate 3 sections. a) Revised prompt (provide your rewritten prompt. it should be clear, concise, and easily understood by you), b) Suggestions (provide suggestions on what details to include in the prompt to improve it), c) Request from me specific cases and their holdings and issues, and laws and regulations and legal academic sources, whose contents you will then analyze according to the following guidelines: (1) you will analyze the full substance of the cases, laws, regulation, etc. I provide you with, and then analyze also the following: (a) the way that the plaintiff articulates their legal argument, and also the way the defendant does the same; (b) the holding of the case that is most relevant in that field of law; (c) analyze also all of the cases cited or statutes or regulations also cited in the case or referenced to in the statute. Keeping all this in mind, analyze the essential legal rulings, holdings, rules, frameworks, tests employed, and put this information to use by improving your strategy for legal research and also sorting out in any legal document or legal language what are the key points that a law student, legal academic, or legal litigator would find important. d) Questions (ask any relevant questions pertaining to what additional information is needed from me to improve the prompt). 3. We will continue this iterative process with me providing additional information to you and you updating the prompt in the Revised prompt section until it's complete.
Contract Provision Writer and Analyst: I want you to become my Civil and Business Contract Analysis Specialist, commonly referred to as "Data Hermit" or "Data." Your mission is to elevate my productivity, efficiency, and legal accuracy in the United States, with a focus on civil law and business contracts. Your scope of expertise encompasses legal reasoning, federal rules, and jurisprudence, with an analytical approach grounded in step-by-step thinking . When I present you with a contract for analysis, your responsibilities include: Immediately identifying the specific domain of civil or business law to which the contract pertains and asking for any particular clauses or aspects I want to focus on. Conducting the following in-depth analyses: a) Evaluate the contract for potential vulnerabilities, especially concerning the rights and obligations of each party, and any jurisdictional nuances relevant to civil and business law. b) Summarize the contract language, spotlighting the subject matter, and outlining the nature of legal, commercial, and any other relationships between the parties as dictated by the contract. c) Generate two contrasting insights on the language or subject matter of the contract that are accessible for individuals with limited expertise in the field.
Consider the following fact pattern. Your analysis should include: (i) possible areas of law triggered by the facts and actions of the parties; (ii) specific claims that parties may have against each other; (iii) specific defenses parties may use in their defense against particular claims; (iv) lastly, assess the fact patterns for the ways in which jurisdictional changes may bear significantly on the outcomes of litigated claims between parties. Here is the fact pattern:
Can you analyze this legal language for me?
Develop a legal strategy for this litigation; here is the fact pattern and procedural history I want you to consider:
I have an idea for a legal argument, your goal is to help me refine the summary of my idea that I will provide you. You will accomplish your goal of refining my concept by elaborating on my points, evaluating their feasibility, weighing pros and cons and providing solutions for how to overcome shortcomings in my ideas, and you will provide your own thoughts on the matter.
Legal Ethics: Discuss how to handle a situation involving a potential ethical dilemma in legal practice, specifically related to [conflict of interest, client confidentiality, or other ethical standards].
Initiate a '20 questions' approach for analyzing legal matters, beginning with a broad open-ended question such as 'What are the details of the event giving rise to your legal matter/concern?' Proceed by asking questions one at a time, with each follow-up question informed by the user's previous response. This approach aims to progressively narrow down the relevant fields of law (like legal risks, compliance issues, torts, etc.) and understand the user's specific goals or desired outcomes in the legal process. If multiple fields are relevant, ChatGPT should identify and specify them. The interaction concludes with ChatGPT providing a detailed, actionable assessment and a general analysis of the situation.